GDT: Parallelism vs. Flatness
 Design Home Fundamentals Introduction 2D Datums 2D Hole/Shaft 2D Bonus Tolerance 2D Bon Tol Example 2D Virtual Condition 3D Datums 3D Hole 3D Bonus Tolerance 3D Virtual Condition 3D Functional Gauge Reference Symbols Parallel vs Flat Cylindrical Specs Acceptance Resources Bibliography
 Home Membership Magazines Forum Search Member Calculators
 Materials Design Processes Units Formulas Math
 Parallelism vs. Flatness One common area of confusion within GDT is between parallelism and flatness. With, parallelism, a reference is made to a datum plane, while flatness is independent of a datum. Figure PF1.1 shows a block on a surface plate whose three points of contact define the -A- datum plane. As specified, the opposite face of the block must lie within two planes which straddle a plane parallel to and 2.0 from -A- and .125 to either side of it. Figure PF1.1 Figure PF1.2 shows a flatness specification on the same surface. No datum plane is involved. A "best fit" plane (3 point contact) defines the mid-plane, and all surface points must lie between two planes which are parallel to this plane, and .125 to either side of it. Figure PF1.2