engineering fundamentals GDT: Parallelism vs. Flatness
Directory | Career | News | Standards | Industrial | SpecSearch®
Design Home
Fundamentals
Introduction
2D Datums
2D Hole/Shaft
2D Bonus Tolerance
2D Bon Tol Example
2D Virtual Condition
3D Datums
3D Hole
3D Bonus Tolerance
3D Virtual Condition
3D Functional Gauge
Reference
Symbols
Parallel vs Flat
Cylindrical Specs
Acceptance
Resources
Bibliography


Login

Home Membership Store Forum Search Member Calculators

Materials

Design

Processes

Units

Formulas

Math
Parallelism vs. Flatness
One common area of confusion within GDT is between parallelism and flatness. With, parallelism, a reference is made to a datum plane, while flatness is independent of a datum. Figure PF1.1 shows a block on a surface plate whose three points of contact define the -A- datum plane. As specified, the opposite face of the block must lie within two planes which straddle a plane parallel to and 2.0 from -A- and .125 to either side of it.

Figure PF1.1


Figure PF1.2 shows a flatness specification on the same surface. No datum plane is involved. A "best fit" plane (3 point contact) defines the mid-plane, and all surface points must lie between two planes which are parallel to this plane, and .125 to either side of it.

Figure PF1.2

Home  Membership  About Us  Privacy  Disclaimer  Contact  Advertise

Copyright © 2009 eFunda, Inc.