engineering fundamentals Discussion Forum
Directory | Career | News | Standards | Industrial | SpecSearch®
Home Membership Magazines Forum Search Member Calculators

Materials

Design

Processes

Units

Formulas

Math
List Recent Topics | Start a New Topic
 

<< Previous Message No. 15613 Next >>
Author: rorschach
Time: 03/21/05 13:23 PST
This is a reply to message no. 15612 by Rhysy
Reply | Original Message | New Topic | List Topics | List Messages on This Topic
Current Topic:
How efficient is iron smelting ?
since you are an astrophysics student, I'm going to make a big assumption here, if I'm wrong well, plan "B"... I'm assuming you are trying to figure out how much mass and energy you'll need to launch in order to smelt an asteroid. consider another thought. if it is an asteroid and not something planetary like say, mars....

you don't NEED carbon to tie up the oxygen. all you need is heat and  a vacuum. and lo and behold what do you have all around you in space? a vacuum of a quality that most semiconductor manufacturers envy.... save the carbon to add back to the refined iron to make steel with instead.

and by the way. you wouldn't need a very massive furnace, since you won't have any conduction, only radiative heating, you don't need a particularly strong vessel. vacuum alone is a very good insulator. you could concievably use something akin to a solar sail to focus solar energy onto your furnace load thereby making the energy required free. perhaps a magnetic field to contain your furnace load

again assuming I'm understanding what you are after, you need to re-think the process. processes that work in a gravity field and/or atmosphere don't work the same way outside one.

what is the goal. and how do you arrive at that goal. doing things like you would on earth probably won't work the same in space.
[ List Replies to This Message Only ]

Home  Membership  About Us  Privacy  Disclaimer  Contact  Advertise

Copyright © 2017 eFunda, Inc.