Discussion Forum
 • Materials • Design Center • Processes • Units & Constants • Formulas • Mathematics
 Home Membership Magazines Forum Search Member Calculators
 Materials Design Processes Units Formulas Math
List Recent Topics | Start a New Topic

 << Previous Message No. 15646 Next >>
 Author: b1ueshift Time: 03/23/05 21:46 PST This is a reply to message no. 15612 by Rhysy Reply | Original Message | New Topic | List Topics | List Messages on This Topic
 Current Topic:How efficient is iron smelting ? Something really big is being missed. Iron isn't worth much and transporting stuff back from Mars is really really expensive (so expensive it's never been done - everything that has gone to Mars is still there). Getting the material from mars to low earth orbit would mean getting a vehicle to Mars with enough fuel and oxygen to lift it off the surface with a payload (the solid rocket boosters that the space shuttle uses won't work if there's no oxygen).  I'm thinking you'll need a vehicle similar to the Saturn 5 for this. Here's a link with info about the vehicle http://www.answers.com/topic/saturn-v (isn't google wonderful).  Anyway you'll need a scaled down version of the vehicle because it's too big for your mass allowance.  Anyway the ratio of vehicle mass to payload mass is about 50:1 for moon shots.  Since Mars has a lower gravity than the earths, this ratio of vehicle mass to payload mass might be 20:1.  Following this reasoning, a 200 000kg vehicle could transport 10 000kg of Iron which has a market value about US \$2000.   So you send 500 tons of equipment to mars for a financle return of \$2000 a couple of years later - I don't see the comercial potential.