eFunda: Introduction to Structural Foam Molding
engineering fundamentals Introduction to Structural Foam Molding
Directory | Career | News | Standards | Industrial | SpecSearch®
Home Membership Magazines Forum Search Member Calculators

Materials

Design

Processes

Units

Formulas

Math
Introduction to Structural Foam Molding
Structural Foam Molding is, in essence, a low pressure injection molding process. It is used to process thermoplastics, such as high density polyethylene (HDPE), in a low pressure environment. Instead of using high pressures to force the molten polymer to fill up the cavity of the mold, structural foam molding relies on the foaming action caused by an inert gas distributed in the plastic material to facilitate the flow. Alternatively, foaming can also be created by the gases released by the decomposition of a chemical blowing agent added to the resin.

Due to the lack of high pressures during the molding process, structural foam parts generally have thicker wall sections. Also, structural foams have a significant density reduction, sometimes as large as 40%, from its base material. They typically exhibit excellent strength-to-weight ratio, improved thermal and acoustic insulation properties, but suffer from lower tensile strengths.

Compared with injection molding, structural foam molding can use cheaper and lighter molds (aluminum instead of tool steel), and it can be used to produce larger parts. The downside is lower production speed. The setup cost of structural foam molding is also lower, making it a viable alternative to injection molding for low-volume applications.

In additional to HDPE, other polymers commonly used in structural foam molding are:

Other than needing thicker wall sections, the design considerations of structural foam molding is very similar to those of injection molding.

Pros and Cons of Structural Foam Molding
Pros
  • Lower setup costs than injection molding
  • Allows the use of lighter, less expensive (aluminum) molds
  • Allows larger product sizes than injection molding
  • Lower internal stresses than injection and compression molding
Cons
  • Higher setup costs than compression molding
  • Lower production rate than injection molding
Home  Membership  About Us  Privacy  Disclaimer  Contact  Advertise

Copyright © 2017 eFunda, Inc.