| Parallelism vs. Flatness |
 |
|
One common area of confusion within GDT is between parallelism and flatness. With, parallelism, a reference is made to a datum plane, while flatness is independent of a datum. Figure PF1.1 shows a block on a surface plate whose three points of contact define the -A- datum plane. As specified, the opposite face of the block must lie within two planes which straddle a plane parallel to and 2.0 from -A- and .125 to either side of it. Figure PF1.1  Figure PF1.2 shows a flatness specification on the same surface. No datum plane is involved. A "best fit" plane (3 point contact) defines the mid-plane, and all surface points must lie between two planes which are parallel to this plane, and .125 to either side of it. Figure PF1.2  |
| Design Home | |
 |
Fundamentals |
 |
Introduction |
|
2D Datums |
|
2D Hole/Shaft |
|
2D Bonus Tolerance |
|
2D Bon Tol Example |
|
2D Virtual Condition |
|
3D Datums |
|
3D Hole |
|
3D Bonus Tolerance |
|
3D Virtual Condition |
|
3D Functional Gauge |
|
Reference |
|
Symbols |
|
Parallel vs Flat |
|
Cylindrical Specs |
|
Acceptance |
|
Resources |
|
Bibliography |
Glossary
Essentials of Manufacturing
Information, coverage of important developments and expert commentary in manufacturing.
3D Scanners
A white paper to assist in the evaluation of 3D scanning hardware solutions.
Negotiate Your Salary
Learn the best principles to negotiate the salary you deserve!
CNC Machining Design Guide
Optimize your designs, reduce machining time, and lower your costs.